WikiLeaks Founder to Sue Australian Prime MinisterAdded: Friday, October 12th, 2012
Category: Recent Headlines Involving File Sharing > Ridiculous Criminal Trials
Tags:ET, p2p, Torrent, Piracy, Peer To Peer, Network, Hackers, Internet, BitTorrent, Google, utorrent, bitcomet, extratorrent, 2010, www.extratorrent.com
Julian Assange, currently under investigation after two women claimed they were sexually assaulted by him, has decided to pay back and drag another woman into court with claims that she defamed him.
Although Julian Assange believes that it’s too dangerous to face criminal charges in court, he at the same time reckons that it’s absolutely safe for him to launch a lawsuit against Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard for defamation.
Assange said in the interview that he has already hired legal representatives in Sydney who are considering the ways he could sue Julia Gillard for things she said two years ago. The matter was that the Prime Minister referred to Assange’s service publication of classified data as “grossly irresponsible” and “illegal”.
WikiLeaks founder claimed that the Australian Federal Police cleared his portal of violating any legislation, but the comments of the Prime Minister caused credit card companies to prevent their customers from donating to the whistle-blowing service. Julian Assange pointed out that when MasterCard was asked to justify why it blocked the Australian citizens from donating to the portal, the company cited that statement by the local prime Minister as justification.
It looks like the WikiLeaks founder is annoyed that the local government hasn’t offered him any help since he was arrested two years ago. Julian Assange claimed that his situation was interfering severely with his family life. Indeed, his family had to change name, location, and keep hiding even from himself. Assange admits that inability to visit his family and do things important to everyone like seeing the skyline and visiting his homeland poisons his life, and the governments are not paying attention to this.
October 12th,2012Posted by:
Friday, October 12th, 2012
|God Bless Julian Assange|
|posted by (2012-10-12 21:20:41)|
|It is true though.... Julian is a disturb person.|
1. He hasn't been "charged" with anything, so far, in Sweden
2. He didn't "leak" anything - he published what an American soldier leaked
3. International newspapers like The Guardian, New York Times, etc also published the material
4. He skipped out on his bond in London, and that's against British law
5. US governments have had a string of war-mongering presidents
6. George W Bush, Jr, Tony Blair, John Howard, etc, should face charges in The Hague over the invasion Iraq
7. When will B.Obama close down Guantanamo Bay (like he promised)?
(Reprinting a previous post.)
What ever happened to the 'Presumption of Innocence'
That is one of the things I have admired about the U.S. In Australia the only presumption is that when you get arrested they beat the shit out of you.
|That is one of the things I have admired about the U.S. In Australia the only presumption is that when you get arrested they beat the shit out of you. this guy needs a bit more education|
|posted by (2012-10-13 06:41:00)|
|A true Hero!! Fighting for freedom of speech and freedom of information! The Zion order needs to know we know about them and their deeds!|
|There is no stopping the NWO|
Its all too late.
|posted by (2012-10-13 11:20:55)|
|Is it true that if you have sex without a condom you can be charged with rape (even consenting adults) in Sweden? I think that is the charge he's on. Why can't they interviw him in London?|
|posted by (2012-10-14 05:16:22)|
|It's not that the can't interview Assange in London. It's that they DON'T WANT TO. It's easy enough for them to run a teleconference to his residence at the Ecuadorian Embassy, or even to visit him in person. These remedies have been suggested several times by Assange and his reps. But no. They want him physically brought to Sweden. Extradicted without charge. Why? Two words: Gottfrid Swartholm. The founder of The Pirate Bay. After Sweden paid Cambodia just under $60 million in "foreign aid", Swartholm was immediately "deported" to Sweden. He's been held in a small cell there for weeks, he STILL hasn't been charged with any crime, and they're trying to force a confession out of him.|
With Assange, it would be even worse. And he would be rendered from Sweden to a US prison facility, or Guantanamo Bay after coughing up whatever they needed to form a false legal basis for charging him with "treason". There would be a quick trial and then he would be executed.
At the near $60 million price tag for Swartholm, Swartholm has the distinction of having a higher price on his head than Bin Laden. I wonder what the price on Assange's head is? Frankly, I'm amazed he's even still alive.
|good work julian...!!!|
|I don't care much for the pm anyway.||
Most Popular Stories