| Author | Message |
|---|
|  Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:29  Im sick of encoders not being honest about Quality...Like with this one daybreakers "dvdscreener" by extrascene which was later relabeled a TC, anyway, he certainly lied about quality....V10 A9, now i always try to be honest about quality whether i encoded it, uploaded it, or just commenting on anothers post...Now no way in hell is a TC every gonna have a V10, that is a load of bullsh1t IMO, please new and old encoders, be honest about quality, sick of downloading sh1t and finding out the video is not as good as the uploader says it to be, BE HONEST! thats all im asking.... |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:33 Author:  hahahaha... i agree with you Emery.. but wouldnt you rate your own encode a 10.10... ??? |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:34 Author: unless its not a DVDRip(which is all i do) then no...if it was a cam i most certainly wouldnt rate it a 10....anything under a DVDRip i do not rate a 10.10 |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:40 Author: I disagree>>> I cant put a cam up aginst a dvd or BR...Its no contest.
But for people who actually get the cams..Rate a cam as a cam
R5/Screener being the best and TS and first cam normally lower.
Ive seen some Tele sync that were almoast dvd quality..To me thats 10/10
For a cam! |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:42 Author: I agree with ya Emery...although I know source was being mislabeled as well... we all try o put up the best rips possible and thats why I made a post befor about stating your source. A re-worked cam is in fact a reworked cam....state it and be done... Love all my encode brothers and sisters(even if she mislabels a few)
peace, rick
|
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:44 Author: no cam, ts, tc, r5, dvdscreener, or screener is ever worth a 10
that 2012 cam was great yes, but certainly no 10 because u could still
tell that it is a CAM video...which is there for either worth an 8, or 9
some r5s have poor picture too which gives them a 9.5/10 usually
and dvdscreeners have watermarks which cancel out the 10/10
vhs screeners are fuzzy which cancels out the 10/10
and TCs have burn marks which also cancels out the 10/10, No matter
who encodes it! it could be encoded in H264 codec and still not be a 10
plus most cams are Re-encodes anyway which takes away quality which also
takes away the 9 or 8 out of 10 it should get...
thats just IMO |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:48 Author:
Quote:
¨no cam, ts, tc, r5, dvdscreener, or screener is ever worth a 10
well to a cam lover the crap cam can be 10/10 there is a reason i dont rate cam that much since im a cam hater all cam to me is like 4/4 and im nice |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:48 Author: If you are rating cams and dvdrips in the same catagory than you have to also put the dvdrips up aginst the blurays.
So in this case none of your torrents are 10/10 maybe 7V/9A at best |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:49 Author: Emery... i mean to tell me ReleaseLounge screeners wher no 10.. Noir R5 look way better than most DvdRip of that same movie...
Example ReleaseLounge screener of Blind Side.. they hae the removal tool to remove property of... just cause it doesnt have the letters makes it a 10.10 or if it did have the letters does that take down the 10 for video.. to me it doesnt.. |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:51 Author: wow...i never said that did i....im saying anything under the Tag DVDRip is never worth a 10/10.... anything over is a 10/10. dvdrips, and blurays are always worth a 10/10....but come on, anything under a DVDRip Tag is never worth a 10...each qualtiy film has its own category, as i said, no cam, ts, tc, screener, dvdscreener, or region 5 aka R5, is never worth a 10/10 because there is bound to be picture or audio troubles... |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:52 Author: sorry for double post i didnt c skillz post:
anyway i never think either of them every have a 10/10 r5 or screener
i always rate it a 9/10 at best.... |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:54 Author: we all have a opinion about quallity but ofc uploaders encoders ect should be honest dont say 10/10 jsut to get ppl to download it |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 17:58 Author: thats basically all im sayin taker  |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 18:00 Author: Emry i just saying rate them all in the same catagory or rate them seprately. You rating based on quality and your right there will be flaws on any cam. But can just put them aginst the quality of a dvd...Unless you put dvd quality aginst bluray |
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 18:28 Author: whats the point of this moan anyway...half the folk are that excited on getting the release..they just bang on 10/10 anyway..without even having it downloaded...lol. |
|
![View Torrent Info: [ 18] Los.Ritos.Sexuales.Del.Diablo.1982.720p.BRRip.x264.AAC-ETRG](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5302506.jpg)
![View Torrent Info: The.Exorcist.S01E08.WEB-DL.x264-FUM[ettv]](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5302320.jpg)
![View Torrent Info: Van.Helsing.S01E10.WEB-DL.x264-FUM[ettv]](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5302322.jpg)
![View Torrent Info: Z.Nation.S03E10.WEB-DL.x264-FUM[ettv]](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5302317.jpg)
![View Torrent Info: The.Vampire.Diaries.S08E05.HDTV.x264-LOL[ettv]](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5301863.jpg)
![View Torrent Info: Force 2 (2016) 720p - DesiSCR - x264 - AC3 - [DDR]](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5302025.jpg)
![View Torrent Info: Tum Bin 2 (2016) DesiSCR 1CDRIP x264 AAC [DDR]](http://images4et.com/images/torrents/5302495.jpg)
